Letter to Planning Commission Re: Rivian Automotive at 340 Fell

September 1, 2021

Dear San Francisco Planning Commission:

The Hayes Valley Small Business Association (HVSBA) does not support the proposal for a Rivian Automotive in Hayes Valley. A luxury car showroom, funded by Amazon, Ford Motor Company, and Blackstone does not lend itself as a neighborhood serving business.

Formula Retail legislation in Hayes Valley is at a critical juncture. Lack of monitoring and weak enforcement have created loopholes and opportunities for emerging and established chains to circumvent legislation intended to prevent predatory entities from displacing the local business community. The legislation needs to be strengthened rather than relaxed. 

Locally funded small businesses in Hayes Valley (many of which are our members) built the equity and appeal of our business community, which now has the attention of deeply pocketed interests. The interests and efforts of our local entrepreneurs are deeply intertwined with the unique character of our neighborhood. 

The encroachment of Rivian (or any emerging chain store) on our commercial landscape is a direct threat to the ability of small businesses to compete for leases, resources, and the political will of our City leadership, elected or appointed. Hayes Valley should continue to strive to be an environment that encourages and supports local entrepreneurship. 

We ask that you deny this request for a CU.

HVSBA

Letter to Planning Commission Re: Trader Joe’s at 555 Fulton

July 21, 2021

Dear San Francisco Planning Commission:

The Hayes Valley Small Business Association (HVSBA) does not support the proposal for a Trader Joe’s in Hayes Valley. Loopholes in the enforcement of Formula Retail Ban (FRB) have allowed for a significant increase in Formula Retail Chains. The economic impact of Covid-19 is facilitating the exploitation of those loopholes.

A chain store of this size coming to the neighborhood is alarming. The impact it will have on existing independent small businesses, traffic, parking and local hires gravely concerns us.  

555 Fulton was set to usher in a “family grocery store” – which Trader Joe’s definitively is not. A national chain with centralized purchasing and marketing power threatens the very foundation the merchant corridor of Hayes Valley was built upon. 

As our businesses struggle to recover from the impact of the pandemic, we are entering a critical period which will likely determine their survival as well as the character of our business community. Our organization, HVSBA, requests that you consider the additional stress of this weakening of the formula retail ban on our local merchants. 

Please reconsider this approval.

HVSBA

Hayes Valley Community / Notice To Be Included

3.9.2021

Many residents and merchants in the Hayes Valley community are increasingly frustrated with the way the City relates to our community entirely through the Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association (HVNA). The HVNA is NOT a democratically run organization nor is it officially sanctioned in any way as representing this community. The leadership is entirely self-appointed, does not seek neighborhood input, and marginalizes and even excludes residents who do not share their views. The “candidates” for elections are a slate of one person per office chosen by the outgoing board. We have stated this fact repeatedly to Kyle Smeallie, Dean Preston and all city agencies. This issue has been acknowledged yet city agencies continue to meet solely with the HVNA to make decisions that affect all of us. 

Recent examples:

HVNA initiated the permit process for the Shared Street program in late summer of 2020. The program was initially slated for 7 days a week because HVNA claimed there was broad support among merchants when in fact many merchants opposed it. HVNA told SFMTA there was a general consensus and they just accepted it as fact. The street closure was presented as a done deal, to be implemented in two weeks, by Supervisor Preston at the very first community Zoom meeting. It was only because of neighborhood push back that it was scaled back to one evening and two days. Once the program rolled out an entire merchant block was forced to circulate a petition to demonstrate the negative financial impacts the closure had on their business; residents who sought to expand outdoor space with street closures were pitted against businesses struggling with the economic impact of the pandemic on the merchant corridor. All of this was avoidable had there been proper outreach, vetting, and input from impacted merchants. The HVNA did not deliver on collecting adequate community input.

Worth noting: there has not been an active merchants association in this time but rather an extended “merchants” sub committee of the HVNA. Just as HVNA doesn’t speak for the majority of residents, this committee does not represent the views of many merchants.

Another recent example involves SFMTA announcing that there are plans to alter parking in our neighborhood. The SFMTA website cites that the plan is being formulated with the HVNA. While the changes do appear positive it’s extremely frustrating to the community at large to hear about these efforts so late in the process with the false claim that they represent the majority.

Moving forward, we demand the following:

We do NOT want any more meetings with the HVNA and City representatives that do not include other neighborhood voices. Specifically we want a representative from Hayes Valley Safe (HVS), which was formed last summer and the newly formed Hayes Valley Small Business Association (HVSBA), and preferably one community member at large to be present at ANY meetings conducted with City officials and agencies regarding any proposed changes or policies which impact our community.

Thank you.

This notification was sent to City Agencies on behalf of the HVSBA and HVSafe.